![[2024] UKUT 222 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Error al cargar el documento
- Heading
- Section 1
- What this appeal is about
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The oral hearing of the appeal
- The legislative framework
- The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 (“the 2006 regulations”)
- Subject to paragraph (10), where—
- Case law
- My decision
- Discussion Which decision was being appealed?
- Addressing whether ZA had capital or was to be treated as having capital
- Which options were available when calculating ZA’s capital through her shareholding in CG?
- How the tribunal dealt with Barnet’s other arguments
- Is Prest v Petrodel relevant when calculating ZA’s capital?
- Conclusions