Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] UKUT 221 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2025] UKUT 221 (AAC)

    Fecha: 12-Jul-2024

    Error al cargar el documento

    Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO
    • Heading
    • Upper Tribunal Judge Mitchell
    • Judicial summary
    • Factual background
    • Allegations 2 and 3 – failing to support young people in line with care plans and failure to follow safeguarding procedures (night of 6/7 November 2020), and prior failure to report a safeguarding con
    • under the heading “ SS [social worker from placing local authority] questioned the processes in place to ensure bank staff members were fully informed of young people’s individual needs and care plans
    • DBS’ decision making
    • Representations against barring
    • there were inaccuracies in the record of the ‘informal conversation’ with the manager of Home 2
    • at Home 1, the Appellant was allowed to use the lounge at night because the office was very cold
    • the LADO’s recommendations for increased safety measures at Home 2 supported the Appellant’s version of events
    • DBS’ decision
    • Incident at Home 1 (Finding 1)
    • Incidents at Home 2 (Findings 2 and 3)
    • “on an un-specified date, you failed to follow reporting procedures after noticing a
    • “you have engaged in conduct which harmed or could harm children and vulnerable adults”
    • “In consideration of your Article 8 rights the following has been considered
    • Legal framework
    • Grounds of appeal and the parties’ arguments
    • DBS’ barring decision making process document (BDMP) contained “no evidential analysis”
    • there is no limit to the form that a mistake of fact may take including an incomplete finding or omission or an inferential finding such as a person’s state of mind (intentions, motives, beliefs): see
    • Appellant’s witness statement
    • at Home 2, no one ever told him that young people in his care displayed sexualised behaviour
    • Appellant’s oral evidence: examination-in-chief
    • Appellant’s oral evidence: re-examination
    • Closing submissions
    • DBS
    • any mistake of fact must be material to the barring decision
    • Closing submissions
    • Analysis
    • Findings 2 and 3
    • Finding 2
    • failing to make records of activities during the night shift (BDMP document)
    • Finding 3
    • Conclusions

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca