The statutory framework
The statutory framework
The DBS decision to include the Appellant on the adults’ barred list was made under paragraph 9 of Schedule 3 to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (‘the SVGA’). This provides that the DBS must include a person in the adults’ barred list if:
it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct,
it has reason to believe that the person is, or has been, or might in the future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to vulnerable adults, and
it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list.
Under paragraph 10, “relevant conduct” for the purposes of paragraph 9 includes conduct which endangers a vulnerable adult or is likely to endanger a vulnerable adult; and a person’s conduct “endangers” a vulnerable adult if he (amongst other things):
harms a vulnerable adult or
causes a vulnerable adult to be harmed or
puts a vulnerable adult at risk of harm or
attempts to harm a vulnerable adult.
Section 4(2) of the SVGA confers a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal against a decision by DBS under paragraph 9 of Schedule 3 (amongst other provisions) but only on grounds that DBS has made a mistake on any point of law (section 4(2)(a)) or in any finding of fact on which the decision was based (section 4(2)(b)). However, the SVGA states that “the decision whether or not it is appropriate for an individual to be included in a barred list is not a question of law or fact” (section 4(3)). In effect, therefore, issues of appropriateness are non-appealable.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The First-tier Tribunal made mistakes in the findings of fact on which its decision was based. Pursuant to Section 4(6)(a) of the Safeguardin
- Introduction
- The two Upper Tribunal oral hearings
- The statutory framework
- The case law authorities
- The people involved in this case
- The factual background
- The DBS decision under appeal
- The Appellant’s grounds of appeal
- The contemporaneous documentary evidence in this case
- The oral evidence in this case
- The Appellant’s oral evidence
- Mr O’s oral evidence
- The Upper Tribunal’s findings of fact
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 052 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)