[2024] UKUT 052 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 052 (AAC)

Fecha: 07-Ene-2025

The statutory framework

The statutory framework

5.

The DBS decision to include the Appellant on the adults’ barred list was made under paragraph 9 of Schedule 3 to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (‘the SVGA’). This provides that the DBS must include a person in the adults’ barred list if:

a.

it is satisfied that the person has engaged in relevant conduct,

b.

it has reason to believe that the person is, or has been, or might in the future be, engaged in regulated activity relating to vulnerable adults, and

c.

it is satisfied that it is appropriate to include the person in the list.

6.

Under paragraph 10, “relevant conduct” for the purposes of paragraph 9 includes conduct which endangers a vulnerable adult or is likely to endanger a vulnerable adult; and a person’s conduct “endangers” a vulnerable adult if he (amongst other things):

a.

harms a vulnerable adult or

b.

causes a vulnerable adult to be harmed or

c.

puts a vulnerable adult at risk of harm or

d.

attempts to harm a vulnerable adult.

7.

Section 4(2) of the SVGA confers a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal against a decision by DBS under paragraph 9 of Schedule 3 (amongst other provisions) but only on grounds that DBS has made a mistake on any point of law (section 4(2)(a)) or in any finding of fact on which the decision was based (section 4(2)(b)). However, the SVGA states that “the decision whether or not it is appropriate for an individual to be included in a barred list is not a question of law or fact” (section 4(3)). In effect, therefore, issues of appropriateness are non-appealable.