Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] UKUT 026 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2025] UKUT 026 (AAC)

    Fecha: 13-Ene-2025

    Error al cargar el documento

    Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO
    • Heading
    • The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve an error of law
    • Background
    • Mr W’s PIP award
    • Mrs W’s new claim for carer’s allowance
    • The FTT’s case management
    • The challenged FTT decision
    • The Upper Tribunal proceedings
    • Other case management by the Upper Tribunal
    • Why I have concluded that there was no material error of law in the challenged FTT decision
    • First main issue: should Mrs W’s new carer’s allowance award have been “backdated” to the start of Mr W’s PIP award?
    • Was the FTT’s decision on Mr W’s PIP appeal a decision on appeal awarding a qualifying benefit ?
    • Was Mrs W’s carer’s allowance claim made “within three months of” the FTT’s decision on Mr W’s PIP appeal?
    • Second main issue: did the Respondent undertake “mandatory reconsideration” of its decision on Mrs W’s new carer’s allowance claim?
    • Other issues raised by Mrs W
    • Conclusions

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca