Heading

Between:
PW
Appellant
- v -
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Citron
Hearing dates: 13 January 2025
Hearing venue: Field House, Breams Buildings, London EC4
Representation:
Appellant: by her husband; neither he nor the Appellant attended the hearing
Respondent: by Paul Skinner of counsel, instructed by Government Legal Department
On appeal from
Tribunal: First-Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Tribunal Case No: SC242/21/01136
Tribunal Venue: Fox Court, London
Decision Date: 11 October 2022
SUMMARY OF DECISION
[CARER’S ALLOWANCE (50.1)]
This case concerns a “backdating” rule in carer’s allowance claims: regulation 6(33) of the Social Security (Claims and Payments) Regulations 1987. The regulation applies where the person being cared for has been awarded a qualifying benefit (by the Respondent, or by the FTT on appeal) and, within 3 months of that, the claimant makes a claim for carer’s allowance. The allowance is then backdated to when the qualifying benefit starts. In this case, the person being cared for had been awarded a qualifying benefit (PIP daily living) by the Respondent, but appealed that decision to the FTT. The claimant then claimed carer’s allowance 11 days before the FTT decision was made, allowing the appeal, and improving the PIP award. The Upper Tribunal decides that although the FTT decision did award a qualifying benefit, the carer’s allowance claim had to be made in the 3 month window starting with the FTT decision – and a claim made 11 days before the FTT decision fell outside this. The appeal was dismissed.
Please note the Summary of Decision is included for the convenience of readers. It does not form part of the decision. The Decision and Reasons of the judge follow.
DECISION
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve an error of law
- Background
- Mr W’s PIP award
- Mrs W’s new claim for carer’s allowance
- The FTT’s case management
- The challenged FTT decision
- The Upper Tribunal proceedings
- Other case management by the Upper Tribunal
- Why I have concluded that there was no material error of law in the challenged FTT decision
- First main issue: should Mrs W’s new carer’s allowance award have been “backdated” to the start of Mr W’s PIP award?
- Was the FTT’s decision on Mr W’s PIP appeal a decision on appeal awarding a qualifying benefit ?
- Was Mrs W’s carer’s allowance claim made “within three months of” the FTT’s decision on Mr W’s PIP appeal?
- Second main issue: did the Respondent undertake “mandatory reconsideration” of its decision on Mrs W’s new carer’s allowance claim?
- Other issues raised by Mrs W
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 026 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)