Heading

Between:
KH
Appellant
- v -
Disclosure and Barring Service
Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Citron, Ms Heggie and Ms Smith
Hearing venue: Manchester CJC
Representation:
Appellant: did not attend and was not represented
Respondent: by Ashley Serr of counsel, instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP
The Upper Tribunal has made orders prohibiting the disclosure or publication of certain names and matters or information relating to the proceedings – see page 126-129 of the Upper Tribunal bundle
SUMMARY OF DECISION
SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS (65.2)
Appellant included in adults’ barred list – appellant was care worker for domiciliary home care organisation – DBS made factual findings that appellant had on certain occasions in 2022 not worn full PPE clothing, discussed themes of a sexual nature with a vulnerable adult service user, and spoken to another vulnerable adult service user in an inappropriate manner – no oral evidence before Upper Tribunal, as appellant did not attend hearing – on evidence before it, Upper Tribunal found no mistake in DBS’s findings – and no mistake on a point of law – appeal dismissed
Please note the Summary of Decision is included for the convenience of readers. It does not form part of the decision. The Decision and Reasons of the Upper Tribunal follow.
DECISION
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Respondent made on 12 December 2022 (DBS reference DBS6191 00981269523 ) to include KH in the adults’ barred list is co
- DBS’s decision
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- KH’s reasons for appealing and the grant of permission to appeal
- Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle
- The Upper Tribunal hearing
- Did DBS make a mistake in a finding of fact on which its decision was based?
- Mistake on point of law?
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 040 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)