![[2025] UKUT 95 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Heading
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Appeal No UA-2024-000490-V
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER [2025] UKUT 95 (AAC)
Between:
FKF
Appellant
- v –
Disclosure and Barring Service
Respondent
Before: Judge Monk
Upper Tribunal Member Graham
Upper Tribunal Member Hutchinson
Hearing date:30 January 2025
Mode of hearing: Oral hearingat Birmingham Civil Justice Centre
Representation:
Appellant: In person
Respondent: Mr D Tinkler of Counsel
Ms J Brown from the DBS
DECISION
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal
- or any information that would be likely to lead to the identification of any of them
- Legal Framework
- The basis for a “relevant conduct” barring decision
- Rights of appeal
- Caselaw
- [55]. The Upper Tribunal also made findings of fact and made comments on other matters. Section 4(7) of the Act provides that where the Upper Tribunal remits a matter to the DBS it "may set out any fi
- There is no limit to the form that a mistake of fact may take. It may consist of an incorrect finding, an incomplete finding, or an omission. It may relate to anything that may properly be the subject
- And at
- And they concluded as follows Drawing the various strands together, we conclude as follows
- Thus, the fundamental point relevant to this case is that unlike in an appeal under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 , it is not necessary for the Upper Tribunal to find an
- “We have considered all the information we hold and are satisfied of the following
- seek timely and necessary medical treatment for him and further
- On 18/4/24 the Respondent sent a Final Decision letter to FKF setting out the Barring Decision [373-377]
- Conclusions