Relevant case law relating to IIDB
Relevant case law relating to IIDB
Three key elements that must be established in order to qualify for IIDB are thus: (a) there has been one or more “accidents” within the meaning of the legislation; (b) that the accidents occurred during the course of employment; and (c) that the accident(s) “caused” the injury. In the present case, the focus is on elements (a) and (c), there being no dispute that the incidents relied on as accidents occurred during the course of employment. Save to the extent set out above, the concepts of accident, injury and causation are not further defined in the legislation, but are questions of fact for the Secretary of State and, in turn, the Tribunal: see R v Industrial Injuries Commissioner, Ex parte Starr (10 July 1974, Thompson J), reported as an Appendix to R(I) 11/74 at 123E-F. Case law does, however, provide some guidance as to approach.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error of law. Under section 12(2) (a), (b)(i) and (3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforc
- REASONS FOR DECISION
- Factual background
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The law
- Industrial injuries benefits for prescribed disease or injury
- Relevant case law relating to IIDB
- Causation
- Injury
- Accident
- The approach of the Upper Tribunal on appeal
- Ground 2 - Failure to address/give reasons for concluding that the other ‘undocumented’ incidents that the Tribunal concluded were an effective cause of the injury were in law “process” rather than pa
- The parties’ submissions
- My conclusions on ground 2
- Ground 1 - Perverse and/or inadequately reasoned conclusion that the 10 specific documented accidents were not an ‘effective cause’ of the injury
- My conclusions on Ground 1
- Identification of the injury
- Identification of the effective causes
- Identification of the accidents
- Extent of disablement
- Ground 3 - Perverse and/or inadequately reasoned reliance on family history of cognitive impairment
- My conclusions on Ground 3
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 365 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)