In this section—
In this section—
“court” includes any tribunal or body exercising the judicial power of the State,
“proceedings in a particular cause or matter” includes any investigation under Part 1 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, any inquest under the Coroners Act (Northern Ireland) 1959 and any post-mortem examination,
“inquiry” means any inquiry or hearing held under any provision contained in, or made under, an enactment, and
except in relation to Scotland, “arbitration” means any arbitration to which Part I of the Arbitration Act 1996 applies.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 30 January 2024 under case number EA/2022/0100 was made in error of law and is set aside The Upper Tribunal remits the appeal to the First-tier
- REASONS FOR DECISION
- Proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal and its decision
- Legal framework
- In this section—
- Grounds on which I granted permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- The hearing on 13 February 2025 and the parties’ submissions
- Rabbi Kanter Webber’s submissions
- The ICO’s submissions
- Hampshire Constabulary’s submissions
- Did the FTT make an error of law in its decision dated 30 January 2024?
- Disposal of appeal
- Is a PMP a court within the meaning and application of section 32 of FOIA?
- A summary of the relevant principles
- My analysis: Does a PMP exercise the judicial power of the state within the meaning and application of section 32 of FOIA?
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 171 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)