Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2025] UKUT 117 (AAC)

Fecha: 12-Mar-2025

Conclusions

Conclusion

68.

For the reasons set out above, we are satisfied that DBS’s decision to bar the appellant was mistaken in law. The only lawful decision on the basis of the evidence before us is that the appellant should not be included in the barred list. We direct that the appellant’s name is removed from the barred list.

Holly Stout

Judge of the Upper Tribunal

Michele Tynan

Tribunal Member

John Hutchinson

Tribunal Member

Authorised by the Judge for issue on 1 April 2025

Heading
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. Pursuant to section 4(6)(a) of the Safeguarding of Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, the Disclosure and Barring Service is directed to remove the a
Introduction
Rule 14: Anonymity
The Upper Tribunal hearing
The documentary evidence
DBS’s decision
The appeal to this Tribunal
The relevant legal principles
The Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction on appeal
Our decision
Relevant conduct
Proportionality
Conclusions