![[2025] UKUT 153 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Mobility
Mobility
When considering mobility activity 1, the FTT found that she could not follow the route of an unfamiliar journey, and concluded that mobility descriptor 1(d) was appropriate. This resulted in an award of ten points and entitlement to the standard rate of the mobility component of PIP. The SOR does not deal with her assertion that she needed another person to be with her when she was out due to her anxiety about mixing with strangers
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal and remake the decision
- Factual background
- Legal framework
- “aided” means with
- “bathe” includes get into or out of an unadapted bath or shower
- Schedule 1 activities as relevant before the Upper Tribunal Daily Living
- “Assessing whether you were able to wash and bathe to an acceptable standard, including other point-scoring descriptors within this activity: The tribunal decided you scored descriptor 4.a (0 points)
- Daily living
- Mobility
- The parties’ submissions before me
- The appellant
- The respondent
- Analysis
- What is Activity 4 assessing?
- Applying this within the descriptors
- My conclusions as to Activity 4
- Soap as an aid?
- omitted
- Conclusions