AG’s evidence
AG’s evidence
The DBS had before it two documents which relate to two interactions that ML (the manager of the home) had with AG.
The first document (at page 48 of the Upper Tribunal bundle) is a handwritten note dated 3 March 2023, six days after the date relevant to the Allegations. It reads as follows:
“Re [AG]
[M]: [A], did RW push you in the back with her hands and say get into your bedroom?
[A]: Stated and showed actions what RW did by pushing his two hands forward then said I’m alright now.
[A] clearly did not want to say anything about staff. Has it clearly upset him.”
The document is signed by [JH].
The second document (which can be found at page 54 of the Upper Tribunal bundle) reads as follows:
“Statement received 20th March 2023
Re: [KS] 10th March 2023
[M] was contacted by [KS] on the 10th March regarding the incident that had taken place with AG and staff member RW.
[K] asked the Home Manager to ask (A) some Questions regarding the incident.
• How is (A) After the incident.
• Replied he was fine.
• Did (RW) push you with her two hands.
• Replied Yes pushed me in the back and told me to get into my room. I’m fine.
• Would (A) Like the Social Worker [K] to speak to his Sister.
• Replied NO he would like either [J] or [M] to talk to his Sister Liz.
• [JH] (Deputy) Contacted (A) sister on 8th of March and informed he [sic] of the incident which took place on the 25th of Feb.
[K] also asked for the question to be asked.
What do you want to happen to the member of staff concerned?
Replied not to look after him again.
[K] Social Care Facilitator also spoke to [A} personally to see if he was all right. And asked him a few questions.”
AG was not called as a witness at the hearing before the Upper Tribunal.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The Disclosure and Barring Service’s decision of 5 April 2024 was based on material mistakes of fact
- Factual background
- Legal framework
- The ‘relevant conduct’ gateway
- The Upper Tribunal’s jurisdiction under the 2006 Act
- The relevant authorities
- The Barring Decision
- The Evidence
- SB’s evidence
- AG’s evidence
- RW’s evidence
- RW’s disciplinary interview
- DBS’s evaluation of the evidence
- Summary of DBS’s case before the Upper Tribunal
- Summary of RW’s case before the Upper Tribunal
- The Upper Tribunal’s assessment of the evidence
- Corroboration provided by AG’s evidence
- Impact of inconsistencies on RW’s credibility, and RW’s live evidence before the Upper Tribunal
- RW’s failure to report her concerns about SB
- No reason to doubt SB’s evidence
- The Upper Tribunal’s assessment of DBS’s findings of fact, and the Upper Tribunal’s own findings of fact
- Allegation 1: “Shouted at resident AG”
- Allegation 2: “threatened to knock AG out, pointing a finger in his face”
- Allegation 3: “told AG to shut up, to go to his room and to stay there”
- Allegation 4: “pushed AG with both hands in his back down the hallway, causing him to stumble”
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 98 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)