![[2025] UKUT 252 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
However, for the reasons I have given in relation to “repeatedly” under regulation 4(2A)(c) of the PIP Regs, I allow the appeal and give the decision set out above.
Stewart Wright
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised for issue on 24 July 2025
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 13 June 2023 under case number SC140/23/00419 was made in error of law. Under section 12(2)(a
- Introduction
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The Secretary of State’s support for the appeal
- The need for an oral hearing
- The written arguments of the parties
- The appellant’s arguments
- Relevant law
- Case law
- Analysis and conclusion
- Within a reasonable time period and resting before the activity
- Conclusions