![[2025] UKUT 262 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Analysis and conclusion
Analysis and conclusion
I will take the judicial review grounds in the order in which CICA advanced them, for reasons which will become apparent. Before doing so, however, I make some general observations on the 2012 Scheme.
- Heading
- I grant the application for judicial review of the decision of the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal of 4 March 2024 under the tribunal case reference 1698-1445-9671-4403 The Upper Tribunal’s order is
- REASONS FOR DECISION
- Relevant factual background
- The FTT’s decision
- The grounds on which permission to seek a judicial review was granted
- The parties’ skeleton arguments
- Interested party
- Relevant law
- Analysis and conclusion
- General observations
- Ground 1 - Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
- Ground 2 - Failure to have regard to paragraph 2 in Annex B
- Ground 3 – Distinction between intent and recklessness
- FTT’s decision was irrational or inadequately reasoned
- Conclusions