Conclusion
Conclusion
Ground 1 (1:1)
Dealing first with the areas of the decision where it is asserted the Tribunal erred. I have read the Tribunal decision as a whole and borne in mind the Practice Direction, in particular that reasons ‘must always enable an appellate body to understand why the decision was reached, so that it is able to assess whether the decision involved the making of an error on a point of law’. I have asked myself whether the decision sufficiently explains why the Tribunal made its decision on the issue of the level of 1:1 support required and conclude that it does not.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal made on 2 October 2024 under number EH895/23/00086 was made in error of law. Under section 12(2)(a) a
- Background
- The hearing
- Tribunal’s decision
- Submissions
- Appellant’s Submissions
- Ground 2 (SLT)
- Respondent’s Submissions
- Ground 2 (SLT)
- Law
- Conclusion
- Ms Fern’s evidence
- Weighing of available evidence
- Placement specific factor
- Specificity
- Ground 2 (SLT)
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 187 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)