Conclusions
Disposal
Having decided to set aside the revocation, we have considered whether to make any further order. We note that because a stay was granted in this case, our allowing the appeal and setting aside the revocation continues, rather than alters, the status quo. It seems to us unnecessary to make any further order: needless to say, if the TC has continuing concerns about the appellant’s compliance, it can commence any action open to it in law (including, needless to say, following any required procedures).
In the light of this outcome, it is unnecessary for us to consider any other arguments or grounds raised by the appellant.
Zachary Citron
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
David Rawsthorn
Gary Roantree
Members of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised by the Judge for issue on 2 July 2025
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal. We order that the Traffic Commissioner’s revocation of Britannia Bus Ltd’s operator’s licence, notified in a letter of 22 May 2024, be set as
- The licence revocation appealed against, and the stay
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- The Upper Tribunal hearing
- Relevant background law
- Background to the revocation in this case
- The appellant’s case
- Why the revocation falls to be set aside
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 231 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)