![[2025] UKUT 218 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Why there was no oral hearing of this matter
Why there was no oral hearing of this matter
No party asked for an oral hearing of the substantive judicial review. I decided the interests of justice did not require an oral hearing because the parties agreed that the FTT decision should be quashed (which means, set aside) and WS’s appeal determined by a fresh Tribunal. I therefore determined the appeal on the papers. It was proportionate to do so.
- Heading
- I grant WS’s application for judicial review of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) dated 22 March 2024 under Tribunal case reference 1703-8625-5480-4261 The Upper Tribunal’s order is
- REASONS FOR DECISION
- Factual background
- Application to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme and decisions
- Appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- Grounds on which I granted permission to bring judicial review proceedings
- The parties’ submissions
- Why there was no oral hearing of this matter
- Legal framework
- Analysis
- Conclusions