[2025] UKUT 239 (AAC)

A Rule 14 Order was made for reasons given in a separate case management order. In summary, I considered that the open justice principle has been sufficiently served in this case by holding an open hearing and publishing this judgment. Although names are important to the principles of open justice and the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, disclosure of the names of the appellants and their child would constitute an unwarranted interference with their Article 8 rights, in particular given their child’s vulnerability.