![[2025] UKUT 328 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
substantial compliance improvements have been made since the public inquiry hearing the financial and related consequences of revocation would be dire
substantial compliance improvements have been made since the public inquiry hearing;
the financial and related consequences of revocation would be dire;
revocation and disqualification were excessive, and a more measured / proportionate sanction should be considered such as “a temporary suspension or operational monitoring period”.
- Heading
- This appeal is DISMISSED. The Traffic Commissioner’s decision of 13 January 2025 directing revocation of the First Appellant’s operator’s licence (no. OH2040441), under section 26(1) of the Goods Vehi
- Introduction
- Factual background
- Undertakings
- DVSA Vehicle Examiner involvement with operator
- The public inquiry
- Fail to notify of change in maintenance arrangements…
- that your vehicles and trailers would be kept fit and serviceable
- Section 10
- The Traffic Commissioner’s decision
- Kyle Gettings lied to DVSA Examiners “about not having driven YK16XYC on the morning of 27 August 2024”
- The Traffic Commissioner’s analysis
- Legal framework
- “that during the five years ending with the date on which the direction is given there has been—
- “that the licence-holder made…for the purposes of—
- Grounds of appeal
- substantial compliance improvements have been made since the public inquiry hearing the financial and related consequences of revocation would be dire
- Conclusions