Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2025] UKUT 328 (AAC)

Fecha: 11-Ago-2025

“that during the five years ending with the date on which the direction is given there has been—

(a)

“that during the five years ending with the date on which the direction is given there has been—

…(iii) a prohibition under section 69 or 70 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (power to prohibit driving of unfit or overloaded vehicles) of the driving of a vehicle of which the licence-holder was the owner when the prohibition was imposed” (section 26(1)(c)(iii);

Heading
This appeal is DISMISSED. The Traffic Commissioner’s decision of 13 January 2025 directing revocation of the First Appellant’s operator’s licence (no. OH2040441), under section 26(1) of the Goods Vehi
Introduction
Factual background
Undertakings
DVSA Vehicle Examiner involvement with operator
The public inquiry
Fail to notify of change in maintenance arrangements…
that your vehicles and trailers would be kept fit and serviceable
Section 10
The Traffic Commissioner’s decision
Kyle Gettings lied to DVSA Examiners “about not having driven YK16XYC on the morning of 27 August 2024”
The Traffic Commissioner’s analysis
Legal framework
“that during the five years ending with the date on which the direction is given there has been—
“that the licence-holder made…for the purposes of—
Grounds of appeal
substantial compliance improvements have been made since the public inquiry hearing the financial and related consequences of revocation would be dire
Conclusions