![[2025] UKUT 328 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
“that the licence-holder made…for the purposes of—
“that the licence-holder made…for the purposes of—
his application for the licence,
an application for the variation of the licence…
a statement of fact that, whether to his knowledge or not, was false, or a statement of expectation that has not been fulfilled” (section 26(1)(e);
“that since the licence was issued or varied there has been a material change in any of the circumstances of the licence-holder that were relevant to the issue or variation of the licence” (section 26(1)(h)).
- Heading
- This appeal is DISMISSED. The Traffic Commissioner’s decision of 13 January 2025 directing revocation of the First Appellant’s operator’s licence (no. OH2040441), under section 26(1) of the Goods Vehi
- Introduction
- Factual background
- Undertakings
- DVSA Vehicle Examiner involvement with operator
- The public inquiry
- Fail to notify of change in maintenance arrangements…
- that your vehicles and trailers would be kept fit and serviceable
- Section 10
- The Traffic Commissioner’s decision
- Kyle Gettings lied to DVSA Examiners “about not having driven YK16XYC on the morning of 27 August 2024”
- The Traffic Commissioner’s analysis
- Legal framework
- “that during the five years ending with the date on which the direction is given there has been—
- “that the licence-holder made…for the purposes of—
- Grounds of appeal
- substantial compliance improvements have been made since the public inquiry hearing the financial and related consequences of revocation would be dire
- Conclusions