Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] UKUT 304 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2025] UKUT 304 (AAC)

    Fecha: 03-Sep-2025

    The same can be said of whether NAC hit IR

    The same can be said of whether NAC hit IR.

    8.

    In deciding whether DBS made a mistake of fact or law, we had to consider the circumstances as they were at the date of DBS’s decision, which was 9 September 2024. See SD v Disclosure v Barring Service [2024] UKUT 249 (AAC). We are entitled to take account of evidence that was not before DBS, provided that it can be related back to that date.

    E.

    Mistake of fact

    • Heading
    • This decision is given under section 4 of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (SVGA from now on)
    • Introduction
    • The oral hearing
    • The legislation The barring provisions
    • The appeal provisions
    • Our approach to the case
    • The same can be said of whether NAC hit IR
    • The evidence
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca