![[2024] UKUT 41 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png){kind=logo}
Error al cargar el documento
- Heading
- Introduction
- The facts
- Rent increases under assured periodic tenancies
- The notice of increase
- The FTT proceedings
- The grounds of appeal
- Issue 1: Was the FTT’s decision unfair because Catalyst had insufficient notice of the case it needed to meet?
- Issue 2: Was the FTT’s decision unfair because it relied on evidence which was not exposed to the parties for comment?
- Issue 3: Did the FTT fail to give adequate reasons for its decision?
- Conclusions