![[2025] UKUT 00018 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png){kind=logo}
Error al cargar el documento
- Heading
- Introduction
- Pitch fee reviews under the 1983 Act
- The FTT’s decision
- Grounds of appeal
- Issue 1: Must a deterioration or decrease in amenity affect the whole or most of the site before the presumption of an RPI increase will be displaced?
- Issue 2: Must a decrease or deterioration be permanent to displace the presumption?
- Issue 3: Did the FTT ask itself the right question before deciding there should be no increase or only a restricted increase?
- Issue 4: Did the FTT take into account irrelevant considerations?
- Conclusions