The claims for compensation
63Regarding the compensation for the harm the applicant claims to have suffered, it must be noted that he merely refers to a list of infringements of rights and the existence of non-material and material harm, without providing any further explanation or referring to any evidence.
64In that regard, it must be observed, inter alia, that although the applicant relies on medical certificates placing him on sick leave and stating that he is temporarily unable to work, the fact remains that he does not explain how those items of evidence make it possible to establish a causal link between the misconduct he attributes to the EIB and the harm he claims to have suffered.
65Thus, in addition to the fact that it is impossible for the Court to determine whether the harm claimed can be separated from the unlawfulness on which the annulment of the contested decision is based, it is clear that the applicant has not provided enough evidence in support of his claims for compensation to enable those claims to be regarded as admissible.
66Accordingly, all of the applicant’s claims for compensation must be dismissed as inadmissible on the ground that they do not meet the requirements of Article76(d) of the Rules of Procedure.