(Reference for a preliminary ruling– Social policy– Directive 2000/78
Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

(Reference for a preliminary ruling– Social policy– Directive 2000/78

Fecha: 10-Feb-2022

European Union law

7Recitals16, 17, 20 and 21 of Directive 2000/78 state as follows:

‘(16)The provision of measures to accommodate the needs of disabled people at the workplace plays an important role in combating discrimination on grounds of disability.

(17)This Directive does not require the recruitment, promotion, maintenance in employment or training of an individual who is not competent, capable and available to perform the essential functions of the post concerned or to undergo the relevant training, without prejudice to the obligation to provide reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities.

(20)Appropriate measures should be provided, i.e. effective and practical measures to adapt the workplace to the disability, for example adapting premises and equipment, patterns of working time, the distribution of tasks or the provision of training or integration resources.

(21)To determine whether the measures in question give rise to a disproportionate burden, account should be taken in particular of the financial and other costs entailed, the scale and financial resources of the organisation or undertaking and the possibility of obtaining public funding or any other assistance.’

8Article3 of the same directive, headed ‘Scope’, states in paragraph1 thereof:

‘Within the limits of the areas of competence conferred on the [European Union], this Directive shall apply to all persons, as regards both the public and private sectors, including public bodies, in relation to:

(a)conditions for access to employment, to self-employment or to occupation, including selection criteria and recruitment conditions, whatever the branch of activity and at all levels of the professional hierarchy, including promotion;

(b)access to all types and to all levels of vocational guidance, vocational training, advanced vocational training and retraining, including practical work experience;

(c)employment and working conditions, including dismissals and pay;

…’

9Article5 of that directive, headed ‘Reasonable accommodation for disabled persons’, provides:

‘In order to guarantee compliance with the principle of equal treatment in relation to persons with disabilities, reasonable accommodation shall be provided. This means that employers shall take appropriate measures, where needed in a particular case, to enable a person with a disability to have access to, participate in, or advance in employment, or to undergo training, unless such measures would impose a disproportionate burden on the employer. This burden shall not be disproportionate when it is sufficiently remedied by measures existing within the framework of the disability policy of the Member State concerned.’

Belgian law

10The loi tendant à lutter contre certaines formes de discriminations (Law to combat certain forms of discrimination), of 10May 2007, which transposes Directive 2000/78 into Belgian law, prohibits direct and indirect discrimination based on one of the protected criteria, set out in Article4, 4°, of that law, which include the current or future state of health, and disability.

11Under Article9 of that law, an indirect distinction on the basis of disability constitutes indirect discrimination unless it is demonstrated that no reasonable accommodation can be made. Under Article14 of that law, all forms of discrimination are prohibited, with discrimination including, inter alia, direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and the refusal to make reasonable accommodation for a person with a disability.

12In that regard, Article4, 12°, of that same law defines the concept of ‘reasonable accommodation’ as all ‘appropriate measures, based on the needs of a given situation, in order to enable a person with a disability to have access to, participate in and advance in the areas to which that law applies, unless those measures create a disproportionate burden on the person who has to adopt them. This burden shall not be disproportionate when it is sufficiently remedied by existing measures within the framework of the public policy with regard to disabled persons’.