Ground 2
. The members of the Planning Committee who authorised the grant of permission for the residential development did not see NPC Ltd’s financial justification or the DVS report. These were documents which they were required to see pursuant to the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations 1999 (“the EIA Regulations”). Without sight of them, the Committee was plainly unable to assess whether the objections by the Claimant and others had real substance.
- THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE FLAUX
- Judgment
- Mr Justice Flaux:
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Mass Energy
- Bedford
- Bristol City Council v Portland and Brunswick Squares Association
- Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
- R (Finn-Kelcey) v Milton Keynes Council
- R v Exeter City Council Ex p. JL
- Thomas & Co Ltd
- Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
- R v Ceredigion CC Ex p. McKeown
- Finn-Kelcey
- R (Roundham & Larling Parish Council) v Breckland Council
- Breckland Council