![AC-2023-LON-002171 - [2024] EWHC 132 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Charges 6(b)(2) and 6(e)
Charges 6(b)(2) and 6(e)
I note that the PCC’s finding regarding the Appellant’s genuine misunderstanding regarding Box 3 and Box 5 of the FP17 that led it to find that dishonesty had not been proved under charge 5(b), was also applied by the Committee in making similar findings in respect of charges 6(b)(2) and 6(e).
- Heading
- Introduction
- Facts and circumstances and the PCC’s findings
- The GDS contract and FP17
- The charges and the outcomes
- The evidence before the PCC
- The evidence, submissions and ruling in relation to Schedule C
- The submissions and the legal advice received
- The PCC’s ruling
- The PCC’s reasoning in respect of the material charges
- Charge 3
- Charge 4(c)
- Charge 4(e)(1)
- Charge 5(b)
- Charge 5(c)
- Charge 5(g)
- Charge 6(a)
- Charges 6(b)(2) and 6(e)
- Charge 6(f)
- Charge 7(a)
- Charges 7(b) – 7(g)
- Charge 17(b)
- The legal framework
- Dishonesty
- Hearsay evidence
- The Appellant’s submissions
- Ground 2
- Charge 5(g)
- Charge 17(b)
- Discussion and conclusions
- The PCC’s exercise of its discretion
- Ground 2
- Charge 5(g)
- Charge 17(b)
- Conclusions