Intentionally encouraging or assisting the trafficking of human beings for the purposes of sexual exploitation
Intentionally encouraging or assisting the trafficking of human beings for the purposes of sexual exploitation
The Serious Crime Act 2007 provides as follows:
Section 44:
“Intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence
(1) A person commits an offence if–
(a) he does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and
(b) he intends to encourage or assist its commission.
(2) But he is not to be taken to have intended to encourage or assist the commission of an offence merely because such encouragement or assistance was a foreseeable consequence of his act.”
Section 45:
“A person commits an offence if–
(a) he does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and
(b) he believes–
(i) that the offence will be committed; and
(ii) that his act will encourage or assist its commission.”
Section 52:
“Jurisdiction
(1) If a person (D) knows or believes that what he anticipates might take place wholly or partly in England or Wales, he may be guilty of an offence under section 44, 45 no matter where he was at any relevant time.
(2) If it is not proved that D knows or believes that what he anticipates might take place wholly or partly in England or Wales, he is not guilty of an offence under section 44, 45 unless paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 of Schedule 4 applies.
(3) A reference in this section (and in any of those paragraphs) to what D anticipates is to be read as follows–
(a) in relation to an offence under section 44 or 45, it refers to the act which would amount to the commission of the anticipated offence.”
I did not understand Ms Beatty to suggest that any independent issue arose in relation to this way of putting the case apart from the application of s.52, on the basis that the information provided in the Warrant and Further Information did not indicate that Mr Beraru was accused of assisting conduct taking place partly in Romania. It will be apparent from the proceeding paragraphs that I do not accept this submission.
Intentionally encouraging of assisting the facilitation of the use of criminal property
My finding at [46] above applies here.
- Heading
- Section 1
- The Warrant
- The procedural history
- The Correct Test on an Appeal
- Ground 1: the dual criminality ground of appeal
- The application of those principles in this case
- Conspiracy to obtain financial gain by controlling prostitution
- Conspiracy to traffic human being for the purposes of sexual exploitation
- Conspiracy to facilitate the use of criminal property
- Intentionally encouraging or assisting the trafficking of human beings for the purposes of sexual exploitation
- The application to amend to advance proposed Grounds 2 and 3
- Ground 2: extradition would be disproportionate
- Ground 3: is the continued pursuit of the Warrant an abuse of process?
- Conclusions
![AC-2023-LON-001835 - [2025] EWHC 2770 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)