![AC-2024-LON-002644 - [2025] EWHC 2761 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Conclusion
Conclusion
I assess as objectively unreasonable any increase to the Rule 26 Caps in the present case. I refuse the application for variations in the Aarhus costs caps. It follows that Natural England must pay the Claimants’ costs of its failed variation application.
- Heading
- FORDHAM J
- REDACTION
- VARIATION OF AARHUS COSTS CAPS
- Aarhus Costs Caps
- The Public Interest Imperative
- Rule 26 Caps
- Rule 27 Variations
- What are the Rule 26 Caps?
- What is Limb (a)?
- What is Limb (b)?
- My Conclusion
- My Reasons
- Natural England’s Fairer Balance
- Nature of the Exercise
- Conclusion
- Conclusions