![AC-2024-LON-003354 - [2025] EWHC 2270 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Ground 1(c): the Supervision and Delegation issue
Ground 1(c): the Supervision and Delegation issue
Mr Dunlop submits that the claimants’ main residual complaint about the defendant’s published supervision guidance is that it lacks granularity. Lack of granularity or detail is not, he submits, a ground for an irrationality challenge. Moreover, the April 2025 Supervision Practice Advice is a complete answer to any criticism.
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Lambert DBE
- Background
- The Statutory Framework
- The 2024 Order
- Good Medical Practice and other guidance and advice issued by the GMC
- Supervision
- Claimants’ Evidence of Risk to Patient Safety
- Coroners’ investigations and Prevention of Future Death reports
- Mr Benedict Peters
- Mrs Pamela Ann Marking
- The Defendant’s Evidence: Professor Melville
- Scope of Practice and Supervision
- Ground 1
- Grounds 1(a) and 1(c): Scope of Practice and Supervision of Associates
- Ground 1(c): the Supervision and Delegation issue
- Ground 1: Discussion/Conclusion The scope of Ground 1: process and outcome rationality
- Ground 1(a) and Ground 1(c): process irrationality
- Outcome Irrationality
- Ground 1(b): Informed Consent
- Ground 1(b): Discussion/Conclusion
- Ground 2: Tameside duty of inquiry
- Ground 2 Discussion
- Conclusions