Case No. CR-2019-LDS-000669

442.The claims under this head, as set out in Schedule 3, relate to the following expenditure:443.It is accepted by the petitioner that these sums were all re-charged to relevant director’s loan accounts. As such they were not treated as company expenditure. Further the relevant complaint about DLA’s remains to be considered but this particular head adds nothing to it. It follows that the existing claim of unfair prejudice in paragraph 27(iii) of the Petition, to the effect that the costs of providing John with “more than on luxury car at a time” were wrongly treated as proper expenses of LWC when they were not, also fails on the facts and the case as now put.(d)