The further material disclosed by Mr Johnson
The further material disclosed by Mr Johnson
Given the potential relevance to the retrial of how Mr Timol has come not to disclose this further material, which I deal with in section 8 below, it is necessary to understand what that material is.
The original disclosure of the Defendants, which was provided collectively by them in August 2022 (in the sense of each of them providing the same material), was extremely sparse. Further disclosure was provided in November 2022, shortly before the trial, again collectively by the Defendants, which included a significant number of e-mails and other materials from 2013-2015. However, there remained a very small number of documents copied to Mr Timol from the key periods.
In the course of the quantum proceedings, having changed solicitors, Mr Johnson provided further disclosure, primarily of e-mails sent to Mr Timol during the relevant period. There are of the order of 25 e-mails.
- Heading
- JONATHAN HILLIARD KC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court
- Summary of conclusions
- The factual background
- The 2023 Judgment
- My fundings in relation to Mr Timol in the 2023 Judgment in more detail
- The further material disclosed by Mr Johnson
- The Court of Appeal Judgment
- The case pleaded against Mr Timol for the re-trial and his response to it
- Relevant substantive legal principles
- Mr Johnson
- Mr Timol
- What conclusions can be drawn from Mr Timol not having disclosed the further material and his explanations for this?
- Key factual findings
- The role of Mr Timol in more detail
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 2759 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)