Case number: BL-2024-001074 - [2025] EWHC 2954 (Ch)

For the reasons set out above, I consider that Mr. Hill’s failure to serve a notice under CPR 11(1) has prevented him from challenging service and the jurisdiction of the court to hear the claims against him.

Even if I had not come to that conclusion, I consider that service was properly effected on him in Florida and his application to set aside the extension would have failed in any event.

I therefore propose to dismiss the March application and the April application.