Fraudulent/negligent misrepresentations
Fraudulent/negligent misrepresentations
The premise of Ms Lawrence’s case that HNW misrepresented the binding nature of the Loan Agreement is that the Loan Agreement was not binding. If the Loan Agreement was binding, as I consider that it was, the allegation of misrepresentation falls away.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The Procedural Background
- The Facts
- The Loan Agreement
- ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY
- GENERAL Section 8
- The Charge
- HNW’s Application
- Application to strike out the Defence and Counterclaim
- “Not bound by the Loan Agreement”
- Duress/Undue influence
- Fraudulent/negligent misrepresentations
- Other allegations
- Conclusion on HNW’s strike out/summary judgment application
- Ms Lawrence‘s Application
- Application for security for costs
- Application for disclosure
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 908 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)