Commercial Court
Case Nos: CL-2022-000294; CL-2022-000557; - [2025] EWHC 2529 (Comm)
Fecha: 06-Oct-2025
Swiss Re
Swiss Re
Swiss Re also contended that it was entitled to its costs against Genesis, alternatively against war risks insurers. I consider that it should recover its costs in the same way as the other all risks insurers (ie from D2-D6 and from Genesis in the proportions and way I have set out above). As in the case of the Merx action, however, given what I consider the surprising scale of Swiss Re’s costs attributed to the Genesis action, and in circumstances where its position as an all risks insurer was protected by GAR Insurers, I decline to make an order for a payment on account.
- Heading
- MR JUSTICE BUTCHER
- Commencement Date
- It is helpful to recall what was said in Lonestar by Foxton J at [14] - [16]
- Simple or Compound?
- Commencement Date
- AerCap Claim
- Several or Joint liability?
- Impact of Settlements
- Who should bear HFW AR Insurers’ Costs?
- Interest on Costs
- Payments on Account
- Swiss Re
- Merx Claim
- Genesis claim
- Incidence of costs
- Payments on Account
- Swiss Re
- Date of Detailed Assessment
- Permission to Appeal
- Conclusions