![CL-2022-000522 - [2025] EWHC 2739 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set out in this judgment, RMK’s claim fails and must be dismissed. I am most grateful for counsel on both sides for their cogent and persuasive submissions. Further, I record that the oral advocacy at trial included cross-examination by junior counsel of the Defendants’ expert witness, and commend Mr Leung for his skilful execution of that task.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- OVERVIEW OF PARTIES AND CLAIMS
- WITNESSES OF FACT
- EXPERT EVIDENCE
- FACTUAL NARRATIVE
- The attached draft consultancy agreement was similar in structure to the Advisory Agreement ultimately entered into, quoted in § 70 below, but (a) it referred to RMK as the “ Consultant ” (rather than
- The draft provided for total potential fees of US$ 500,000 structured as follows
- APPLICABLE PRINCIPLES
- ANALYSIS
- QUANTUM
- Conclusions