Conclusions
Conclusions
On the Defence Costs Erosion Issue, I hold that the £4 million excess applicable under the Reinsurance Policies is eroded by indemnity payments only.
On the Claims Co-operation Clause Issue, I hold that the clause did not annul, modify or circumscribe the operation and effect of the Follow the Settlements Clause and that, subject to my determination of the Proper and Businesslike Steps Issue, the Reinsurers were bound to follow the TTSA.
On the Proper and Businesslike Steps Issue, I hold that Equitas has failed to show that there was a failure to take all proper and businesslike steps.
On the Interest Issue, I hold that RSA is entitled to simple interest at the rate of 2% above the Bank of England base rate from the date of each respective loss.
I shall adjourn consideration of all consequential matters, including the precise terms of the order giving effect to the foregoing decisions, to a further hearing as proposed by counsel.
- Heading
- Judge Keyser KC
- Issue 1: The Defence Costs Erosion Issue
- Issue 2: The Claims Co-operation Clause Issue
- Issue 3: The Proper and Businesslike Steps Issue
- Inclusion of the limits of the Global Excess Policies was neither reasonable nor principled
- Mr Miller failed to verify the policy limits and attachment points of the Global Excess Policies
- Mr Miller failed to verify the position regarding pollution exclusions in BOC US’s primary policies post-October 1988 Mr Miller failed to verify the position regarding pollution exclusions in BOC US’s excess policies post-October 1985
- The TTSA was entered into prematurely, before opposition briefs had been filed
- Conclusion on Issue 3
- Issue 4: The Interest Issue
- Period of interest
- Compound Interest
- Conclusions
![LM-2024-000252 - [2025] EWHC 2704 (Comm)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_WAai98v.png)