Heading
LADY JUSTICE WHIPPLE Approved Judgment | Hippodrome Casino v HMRC |

ON APPEAL FROM
THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (TAX AND CHANCERY CHAMBER)
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGES RUPERT JONES and VINESH MANDALIA
[2024] UKUT 00027 (TCC)
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London WC2A 2LL
Before :
LORD JUSTICE NEWEY
LADY JUSTICE ASPLIN
and
LADY JUSTICE WHIPPLE
Between :
HIPPODROME CASINO LTD | Appellant |
- and - | |
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS | Respondent |
Andrew Hitchmough KC and Ronan Magee (instructed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) for the Appellant
Matthew Donmall (instructed by General Counsel and Solicitor to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs) for the Respondent
Hearing dates: 24 and 25 June 2025
Approved Judgment
This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.30am on [06.10.25] by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.
…………………
- Heading
- Lady Justice Whipple Introduction
- Legal Framework
- “ Article 173
- Article 174
- “ Article 176
- HCL’s Supplies
- HCL’s Proposed Floorspace Method
- Recoverable under Standard Method (£) Difference (£)
- Decision of the FtT
- Decision of the UT
- Issues
- Issue 2: was the UT right to remake the decision in favour of HMRC?
- Discussion
- Issue 3: how does the Input Tax Order apply in the context of residual input tax apportionment? Introduction
- Discussion
- Conclusions
![CA-2024-000806 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1259](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)