Conclusion
Conclusion
The same points apply to Disputed Head 3 as are noted in Sections 8.4 and 9.4 above. Indeed, I consider that, by referring without explanation to the London property market, this head of loss is even more fanciful than its predecessors. I consider that the judge was right to strike it out as being wholly unarguable.
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE COULSON
- 2.The Background Facts
- The Pleaded Case
- The Wilsons’ Schedule of Loss
- The Judgment
- The Applicable Principles
- The Seven Disputed Heads of Loss: General
- Disputed Head 1: Total Capital Losses The Pleaded Claim
- The Judgment
- The Argument Advanced Now
- Discussion and Conclusion
- Disputed Head 2: Investment Loss The Pleaded Claim
- The Judgment
- The Argument Advanced Now
- Conclusion
- Disputed Head 3: Re-Investment Loss The Pleaded Claim
- The Judgment
- The Argument Advanced Now
- Conclusion
- Disputed Head 4: Rental Income Loss The Pleaded Case
- The Judgment
- Discussion and Conclusion
- Disputed Head 5: Secured Borrowing Loss The Pleaded Claim
- The Judgment
- The Argument Advanced Now
- 4 Conclusion
- Disputed Head 6: Indemnity
- Disputed Head 7: Taxation/ IHT 1 The Pleaded Claim
- The Judgment
- The Argument Advanced Now
- Conclusion
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-001477 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1360](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)