Respondents’ notice
Respondents’ notice
Samsung have served a respondents’ notice contending that the judge’s decision should be upheld for two additional or alternative grounds. Ground 1 is that the general law and practice relating to choice of fora in the arbitration of international commercial disputes supports the selection of a neutral forum to determine FRAND disputes. Ground 2 is that ZTE’s proposed interim licence amounts in effect to a forum non conveniens application by the back door when no such application has been made by ZTE.
- Heading
- Lord Justice Arnold Introduction
- Interim licence declarations: a brief summary of the principles
- Jurisdictional conflict
- Factual background
- The judge’s judgment
- The order under appeal
- Grounds of appeal
- Respondents’ notice
- Appeal grounds 1 and 2 and the respondents’ notice grounds: bad faith
- Appeal ground 4: comity
- Conclusions
![CA-2025-001926 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1383](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)