The Issues on Appeal
The Issues on Appeal
Ground 1 of the appeal encapsulates NHBCs case that, on a proper construction of Option 1, Peabody’s cause of action under the policy of insurance accrued on the date of Vantage’s insolvency. Ground 2 is a complaint that, although Peabody failed to discharge the burden of demonstrating that their claim was in time, the claim was not struck out. Ground 3 is linked, because it suggests that the judge was wrong not to find that, in any event, the cause of action had accrued more than six years before the issue of the claim form. Ground 4 focusses on the judge’s case management, submitting that he erred in keeping to the two hour time limit (which he regarded as inadequate to determine all the issues which had now arisen), rather than adjourning the application, and so only decided the insolvency point. Ground 5 is concerned with the potentially separate issue about the site security costs.
- Heading
- LORD JUSTICE COULSON
- The Insurance Policy
- 3.The Background Facts
- The NHBC’s Application
- The Judgment
- The Law
- The Issues on Appeal
- The Judge’s Case Management Decision (Ground 4)
- The Proper Construction of Option 1 (Ground 1) The Words Used
- Fraud
- Commerciality
- The Colloquial Response
- Summary on Ground 1
- The Limitation Argument (Ground 2)
- The Alternative Case (Ground 3)
- Site Security Costs (Ground 5)
- Conclusions
![CA-2024-002563 - [2025] EWCA Civ 932](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)