![202403291 B4 - [2025] EWCA Crim 1135](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_sHeHK8V.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion:
It was for those reasons that we concluded that the application for leave to appeal against conviction must be refused, but that leave to appeal against sentence should be granted, the sentences imposed below quashed, and concurrent sentences of 3 years’ imprisonment on each count substituted.
- Heading
- Lord Justice Holroyde
- Summary of the background facts
- The criminal proceedings
- Summary of the evidence
- Dr Bunn’s evidence
- The jury’s question
- The sentences
- The grounds of appeal against conviction
- The grounds of appeal against sentence
- Analysis – the appeal against conviction
- Analysis – the appeal against sentence
- Conclusions