The application for a non-molestation injunction
32.It follows from what I have said previously in this judgment that I do not consider that the father requires any protection under section 42 of the Family Law Act 1996. I have considered section 42(5). I have considered all the circumstances, including the need to secure the health, safety and wellbeing of the applicant. In my judgment, this application is a ruse by the applicant. It is dismissed.
- IN THE LIVERPOOL FAMILY COURT
- The applications before the Court
- The father’s previous convictions
- The effect of the father’s criminal convictions for rape and other offences
- My Findings
- Welfare
- The application for a non-molestation injunction
- The mother’s application for a section 91(14) order
- Duration
- End of Judgment.