Hart v Hart
[2017] EWCA Civ 1306; [2018] 2 WLR 509, in which Moylan LJ said at Paragraph [96]:-“If the court has not been able to make a specific factual demarcation but has come to the conclusion that the parties’ wealth includes an element of non-matrimonial property, the court will also have to fit this determination into the section 25 discretionary exercise. The court will have to decide, adopting Wilson LJ’s formulation of the broad approach in
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The relevant history
- The litigation
- Valuation evidence
- Final open proposals
- The Assets Schedule
- Property Particulars
- Costs
- The respective Position Statements
- Duxbury
- Tinker v Tinker
- Lambert
- The Law I must apply
- White v White
- K v L
- Miller/McFarlane
- Hart v Hart
- Miller
- Jones v Jones
- Martin
- WM v HM
- my emphasis)
- Sharp v Sharp
- S v AG
- S v S
- Vaughan
- FB v PS
- The factual issues
- Sharp
- VV v VV