LEGAL PRINCIPLES
53.The parties are broadly agreed as to the law applicable to cases such as this and both have referred me to the decisions of the Court of Appeal in K v K (Children: Permanent Removal from the Jurisdiction) [2011] EWCA Civ 793; Re F (A Child) [2012] EWCA 1364; Re C (Internal Relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1305 and Re F (A Child) (International Relocation Case) [2015] EWCA Civ 882.54.Additionally, the mother, through her counsel, has referred me to the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal in
- INTRODUCTION
- The parents and children
- Financial matters
- The wider family context
- The parties as witnesses
- The parents’ psychiatric health
- The parties’ wishes about relocation
- The CAFCASS Analysis
- VB and EB may experience less of an impact if they are not in contact with him daily
- LEGAL PRINCIPLES
- Re F
- Re C (Internal Relocation)
- Re C (Internal Relocation)
- Re C
- ANALYSIS
- The Mother’s proposal
- The father’s proposal
- The father’s position if relocation is permitted
- manage
- Conclusion