FD25P00001 - [2025] EWHC 892 (Fam)
Family Division of the High Court

FD25P00001 - [2025] EWHC 892 (Fam)

Fecha: 10-Abr-2025

Conclusions

Conclusion

53.

This is one of those cases where:

…..it may be less disruptive for [a child] to remain a little while longer while his medium and longer term future is decided than it would be to return.

54.

Should S be returned to Dubai summarily and the family court there found the allegations of domestic abuse proven, the welfare case for S’s return and relocation to England would be strong, on the basis of my understanding of Mr Allen KC’s evidence. But if that were to happen it would involve further unsettling transitions in the life of this young boy. The least disruptive route is for S to ‘remain a little longer’ whilst the relocation issue is fully and not summarily evaluated. Meanwhile the father and S can develop contact remotely and in person at a supervised contact centre, as the mother has belatedly agreed. Whilst the father has a limited number of days when he can be in this country, I am confident he will come to spend time with his son.

55.

For all these reasons a summary return order is not in S’s best interests. I will hear the parties’ submissions to expedite the determination of a child arrangements order and specific issue order at the hand down.

56.

I thank both counsel for their skilful submissions and ask they draft an order to give effect to this decision.