EA/2023/0538 - [2024] UKFTT 001054 (GRC)
Fecha: 19-Jun-2024
Heading

Case Reference: EA/2023/0538
Information Rights
Heard by Cloud Video Platform
Before
JUDGE STEPHEN ROPER
MEMBER EMMA YATES
MEMBER STEPHEN SHAW
Between
KADHIM SHUBBER
Appellant
and
(1) THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
(2) THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE
Respondents
Representation:
For the Appellant: Aliya Al-Yassinof Counsel
For the First Respondent: did not appear
For the Second Respondent: Alex Shellum of Counsel
Decision: The appeal is Allowed
Substituted Decision Notice:
The Tribunal’s Decision Notice in case reference EA/2023/0538, set out below, is substituted for the Commissioner’s Decision Notice reference IC-251765-V8G2, dated 21 November 2023, with regard to the request for information made to The Serious Fraud Office by Kadhim Shubber dated 29 June 2023.
Substituted Decision Notice
1. The Serious Fraud Office shall disclose the information it holds relating to the request for information made to it by Kadhim Shubber dated 29 June 2023.
2. The Serious Fraud Office must disclose such information within 20 working days of the promulgation of this decision, or (if there is an application to appeal this decision) within 14 working days after being notified of an unsuccessful outcome to such application or any resulting appeal. For these purposes, ‘working day’ has the meaning given in section 10(6) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
3. Failure to comply with this decision may result in the Tribunal making written certification of this fact pursuant to section 61 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and may be dealt with as a contempt of court.
REASONS
- Heading
- Preliminary matters
- Introduction
- Background to the Appeal
- The Request
- The Decision Notice
- The appeal
- The Tribunal’s powers and role
- Mode of hearing
- The evidence and submissions
- Outline of relevant issues
- The relevant statutory framework (Footnote: 1 )
- Exemptions
- Section 31 – Law enforcement
- Discussion and findings
- Was section 31(1)(a), 31(1)(b) and/or 31(1)(c) engaged?
- The ‘precedent effect’ and the ‘mosaic effect’
- Conclusions