First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
EA-2023-0405 - [2024] UKFTT 00700 (GRC)
Fecha: 30-Jul-2024
Ground 2
Ground 2
It is noted that the Commissioner expressly referred to “[…] the importance of confidentiality of communications between the UK and the US and of avoiding the harm disclosure could cause to relations between the two countries. It also referred to the potential chilling effect on everyday exchanges of correspondence in similar circumstances”. It is submitted that these are sufficiently particularised and specific interests which are the subject matter of the exemption in s.27(1). It is submitted that the decision reflected consideration of the requested information and carefully sought to balance the interests at play.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Factual background to the appeal
- Request, decision notice and appeal
- The response
- The Decision Notice
- Notice of Appeal
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- The Commissioner’s response
- HMT’s response
- Ground 1
- Ground 2
- Reply of the appellant
- Distinction between data subjects
- Personal data of Rishi Sunak
- Personal data of other data subjects
- The international relations exemption
- Additional submissions from HMT
- Evidence
- Legal framework
- Section 27(1) International relations
- The role of the tribunal
- Issues
- Conclusions