Was there a qualifying type of attraction?
Was there a qualifying type of attraction?
To benefit from the reduced rate of VAT under Group 16, Ingliston’s supplies must fall within the category of a right of admission to “shows, theatres, circuses, fairs, amusement parks, concerts, museums, zoos, cinemas, exhibitions and similar cultural events and facilities”.
It was common ground that Ingliston was not supplying a right of admission to a show, theatre, circus, fair, amusement park, concert, museum, zoo, cinema, or exhibition. The question in dispute was whether it was supplying a right of admission to a similar cultural event or facility.
HMRC’s submissions on this question focused on the CJEU’s judgment in Erotic Center, where at [17] the court held that the events and facilities listed in what is now Item 7:
“have in particular the common feature that they are available to the public on prior payment of an admission fee giving all those who pay it the right collectively to enjoy the cultural and entertainment services characteristic of those events and facilities.”
HMRC submitted that it follows from this passage that there are three key characteristics of the specified attractions in Group 16 and Item 7 which any non-specified attraction must share if it is to fall within the category of “similar cultural events and facilities”:
First, the enjoyment of the attraction must be collective rather than predominantly personal—this flows from the words “the right collectively to enjoy”.
Second, the collective enjoyment must be specifically by those who have paid the admission fee, not by those who have not—this follows from the words “available to the public on prior payment of an admission fee giving all those who pay it the right collectively to enjoy” (underlining added).
Third, there must be a relatively large number of people who have paid the admission fee and are simultaneously deriving collective enjoyment— this follows from the words “available to the public on prior payment of an admission fee giving all those who pay it the right collectively to enjoy” (underlining added), but is also apparent from consideration of the specified attractions which all share this characteristic.
HMRC contended that Ingliston’s supplies have none of these characteristics. We do not agree. We provide an overview below of HMRC’s case regarding these three characteristics, and explain why we do not accept these submissions.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Hearing and evidence
- Findings of fact
- Relevant law
- Young Driver
- Discussion
- Was Ingliston supplying a right of admission?
- Was there a qualifying type of attraction?
- Collective enjoyment
- Enjoyment specifically by those who have paid
- A relatively large number of people
- Whether similar to a fair or amusement park
- Additional points raised in submissions
- Conclusions
![TC09528 - [2025] UKFTT 00564 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)